- The iPad 2 is in production right now. The number of current iPad shipments are falling and the iPad 2 is scheduled to ship to Apple in January and be available around Feb/March time. 16 million iPads were shipped in 2010. Between 2-3 million are expected to stay in the channel at the start of 2011 which will satisfy demand as production is gradually stopped. "Apple has shifted iPad production from an estimated 2.1 million units in November to just 1.6 million in December in order to prepare for the launch of revised new tablet, expected to be announced in January."
- A USB port. No, really. A tweet from a well connected source seems to believe this is happening. What gives this a sense of credibility is that the source is Eldar Murtazin, Editor in Chief of Mobile-Review. "Talked with colleague which working with some [original design manufacturer] vendors connected with Apple," he wrote. "He is research guy. According to his sources, iPad2 will have usb port." See the tweet for yourself here: http://www.twitlonger.com/show/7…
- Three models will be available. 1 X Wifi. 1 X UMTS 3G. 1 X CDMA with a build ratio of 3 : 4 : 3. Between 60% to 65% of current iPads shipments are the UMTS 3G model.
- Large speaker with a metal grille on the back side of the device.
- Strengthening the anti-smudge and anti-reflective treatments in order to compete against the Kindle and bring in new customers.
- No active-matrix organic LED display. A report by Digi-Times stated that Apple passed on the display because of constrained supplies. The insufficient supplies have allegedly led Apple to stick with a backlit LED display for the iPad 2.
- As many as two cameras. Apple are aggressively pursuing FaceTime within its entire mobile arsenal before making good on a promissory to open up the standard to the rest of the world.
- Smaller measurements. While the screen will stay the same, the new tablet will be 3mm smaller, reportedly measuring 239mm by 186mm. The current iPad was criticised for its wide bezel measuring 242.8mm by 189.7mm
- The back of the iPad 2 will be flat like an iPod touch. This would also resolve criticisms that the iPad's curved back is impractical.
- It's gonna be awesome. Count me in.
Remember when Wired’s debut issue for the iPad sold more than 100,000 times in June? It looks like it will be a while before that type of performance is seen again. Digital sales dropped toward the end of 2010 for all the magazines that make those figures available to the Audit Bureau of Circulations.
Many magazines that are available on the iPad, such as Esquire, People and The New Yorker, have not posted their digital single-issue sales to the ABC. But Vanity Fair sold 8,700 digital editions of its November issue, down from its average of about 10,500 for the August, September and October issues. Glamour sold 4,301 digital editions in September, but sales dropped 20 percent in October and then another 20 percent, to 2,775, in November. GQ’s November edition sold 11,000 times, which was its worst performance since April (when the iPad was released) and represents a slight decline from its average digital sales of 13,000 between May and October.
After Wired’s enormous debut month, the magazine averaged 31,000 digital sales between July and September, but even that fell in October and November, with sales coming in at 22,000 and 23,000, respectively. (For comparison, the magazine sold 130,000 total print editions for October and November.)
Men’s Health, which averaged digital sales of about 2,800 in the spring, sold 2,000 times in both September and October.
All these magazines charge to buy issues on the iPad or iPhone.
Publishers are hopeful their December and January numbers will bump back up after more consumers get their hands on digital devices during the holidays. Call it an early New Year’s wish.
Spotify (v): To repeatedly and embarrassingly fail to launch in the US.
The list also got me wondering which other tech-centric verbs might – or at least should – have been coined this year. Verbs like…
Tumbl (v): To suffer increasing periods of downtime at the same time as the media anoints you the “next big thing” (Replaces last year’s: to Twitter)
Facebook (v): To continue to grow in valuation no matter how many (privacy, ad-scam or Aaron Sorkin movie) scandals surround you. (See also: to sell your soul to the devil)
Quora (v): To build a “highly praised” (and “valuable”) service despite the fact that only twelve people actually use it, just because those twelve people happen to be Silicon Valley investors and reporters. (For antonym see “to Yahoo Answers”)
Instagram (v): To take a shitty photograph, and make it shittier.
Yahoo! (v): To somehow appear even more tragic through the use of optimistic punctuation. (See also: Bebo! Digg! A!O!L!)
TechCrunch (v): To sell your company to a corporation you would criticise others for selling to, at the kind of (reported) valuation that you’d criticise others for accepting, at a time you’d… etc.
Remember their name:
Three experiments demonstrate that remembering someone’s name facilitates their compliance with a purchase request made by the rememberer. Experiment 1 shows that name remembrance increases request compliance, but name forgetting does not cause a decrease in compliance. Experiments 2 and 3 show that name remembrance is perceived as a compliment by the person remembered, which mediates compliance with the purchase request. Experimental manipulations of the likelihood of name remembrance (experiment 2) and need for self-enhancement (experiment 3) provide results consistent with a complimentary explanation for the findings.
Source: What’s in a Name? A Complimentary Means of Persuasion” from Journal of Consumer Research