<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Trust is linked to Transparency. Discuss.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.litmanlive.co.uk/blog/2010/03/trust-is-linked-to-transparency-discuss/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.litmanlive.co.uk/blog/2010/03/trust-is-linked-to-transparency-discuss/</link>
	<description>All the cool stuff I find on the web.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 06:11:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura Tosney</title>
		<link>http://www.litmanlive.co.uk/blog/2010/03/trust-is-linked-to-transparency-discuss/comment-page-1/#comment-1371</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura Tosney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 18:29:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.litmanlive.co.uk/blog/?p=2811#comment-1371</guid>
		<description>Interesting post, Mike...The thing that amuses me about talking about privacy in relation to personal profiles is that...personally, I really don&#039;t think it&#039;s dead. Because it&#039;s all opt-in. What you put on your profiles, what you tweet, where you check-in on Foursquare...it&#039;s all done with an eye to what you really want people to know. Okay, so it doesn&#039;t stop people oversharing, but the point is they&#039;re choosing to put it in the public arena, it isn&#039;t being put out there for them despite their express wishes.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think the bit where privacy really is dead in relation to the internet more importantly, is the stuff that we don&#039;t want mining because it&#039;s technically not in the &#039;public&#039; sphere (&#039;scuse me while I give a hearty glare in the general Google direction).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As for employers and family...tricky one, but there&#039;s always the &quot;politely decline and offer a reason&quot; route...or if all else fails (I know I wimp out on that one), there&#039;s always the limited profile settings ;)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also, I think companies have been screening social profiles for quite a while (&lt;a href=&quot;http://bit.ly/cVGom2&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://bit.ly/cVGom2&lt;/a&gt;). Surely it has to be better for a company to realise the would-be employee might not be the best fit for their company before hiring them? It&#039;s a double-edged knife, I think, given that profiles might give the wrong impression, but personally, I think your networks are usually a fairly accurate reflection of your personality.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;*shrug* My two pennies, for what they&#039;re worth :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting post, Mike&#8230;The thing that amuses me about talking about privacy in relation to personal profiles is that&#8230;personally, I really don&#39;t think it&#39;s dead. Because it&#39;s all opt-in. What you put on your profiles, what you tweet, where you check-in on Foursquare&#8230;it&#39;s all done with an eye to what you really want people to know. Okay, so it doesn&#39;t stop people oversharing, but the point is they&#39;re choosing to put it in the public arena, it isn&#39;t being put out there for them despite their express wishes.</p>
<p>I think the bit where privacy really is dead in relation to the internet more importantly, is the stuff that we don&#39;t want mining because it&#39;s technically not in the &#39;public&#39; sphere (&#39;scuse me while I give a hearty glare in the general Google direction).</p>
<p>As for employers and family&#8230;tricky one, but there&#39;s always the &#8220;politely decline and offer a reason&#8221; route&#8230;or if all else fails (I know I wimp out on that one), there&#39;s always the limited profile settings <img src='http://www.litmanlive.co.uk/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Also, I think companies have been screening social profiles for quite a while (<a href="http://bit.ly/cVGom2" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/cVGom2</a>). Surely it has to be better for a company to realise the would-be employee might not be the best fit for their company before hiring them? It&#39;s a double-edged knife, I think, given that profiles might give the wrong impression, but personally, I think your networks are usually a fairly accurate reflection of your personality.</p>
<p>*shrug* My two pennies, for what they&#39;re worth <img src='http://www.litmanlive.co.uk/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

